Here is a list of some statistical sources available for the John Jay College Library:
Criminal Justice Statistics Database List
A listing of all Criminal Justice databases that deal with criminal justice oriented statistics made available by the LLoyd Sealy Library. If you are accessing them from home, you will need a username and password.
General Statistics Database List
A listing of all Statistics databases that deal with general statistics made available by the LLoyd Sealy Library. If you are accessing them from home, you will need a username and password.
Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statistics
Statistics from the current Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statistics with ongoing updates and the archive back to 1994. The print version is available at the Reference Desk.
Statistical Abstract of the United States (Proquest)
Provides government statistics, business, trade and research information, and private and international statistical information. U.S. governmnet statistics go back to 1973 and private and state sources go back to 1980.
Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS)
Provides statistics about crime, criminal offenders, victims of crime and the operation of justice systems at all levels of government in the United States.
Uniform Crime Reports (FBI)
The FBI's compendium of crime statistics. It includes volumes from 1995 to the present. The print version is available at the Reference Desk.
Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms Statistics
A branch of the Justice Department, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives is responsible for the investigation and prevention of federal offenses involving guns, arson, and illegal alcohol and tobacco. This site lists ATF statistics.
Three key Supreme Court cases have dealt with modern interpretations of the second amendment:
307 U.S. 174, *59 S. Ct. 816, **83 L. Ed. 1206, ***1939 U.S. LEXIS 1162
This case, argued over endless by both second amendment supporters and gun control activists, set the tone for legal interpretations of the second amendment over the bulk of the twentieth century. Interpretations vary; on one end the case could be intepreted as supporting an individual right to bear arms but only on weapons that could be used for militia service while on the other end it could also be intrpreted as saying that citizens only have the right to bear arms if they are members of a militia and for no other reason.
This case, having been decided relatively recently, settled the law if not the debate over the question of whether an individual citizen has the right to bear arms, deciding that a Washington D.C. ban on individuals having handguns in their homes was unconstitutional.
130 S. Ct. 3020, *177 L. Ed. 2d 894, **2010 U.S. LEXIS 5523, ***78 U.S.L.W. 4844
This case, also having been decided relatively recently, clarified the question of whether the decision in Heller vs DC applied to the states or not via the 14th amendments Due Process clause. The court decided that it does apply to the states.